Whiskey Stones: Worth the Hype?22 January 2013 in Op-Ed, Whiskey Accessories and Products
By Jake Emen
I love the idea of whiskey stones, and I wanted to actually love using them. Which is why I was extra disappointed by my experience with them versus my expectations, and wanted to share that with the other whiskey-heads out there.
The premise of whiskey stones, which have been popping up as popular gifts and hot items all over the place, is a simple one – chill your whiskey without diluting it. The concept is fantastic, but there’s a failure of execution.
Don’t get me wrong, when you grab a few whiskey stones from the freezer, they feel ice cold. You’re expecting great things. This could change everything, you happily think to yourself while pouring in your spirit to recommended specifications.
But then… not so much. If you’re using a proper whiskey glass and follow the guidelines of how much spirit you should have versus how many stones, then you’ll notice a slight chill. It certainly takes a bit of the edge off a harsh spirit and lowers the liquid down from room temperature a tad.
However, it’s by no means a substitute for having a few pieces of ice in your glass. The whiskey just never gets that cold, or really, close to that cold. The stones are cold, and the glass may even be cold to the touch. But the liquid you’re drinking isn’t, it hovers just slightly below its starting point fresh out of the bottle.
And if you use a wider glass, or more liquid compared to the number of stones used, then you’ll hardly notice anything at all.
When you pay attention to the fine print of the box, you’ll see a description that provides a disclaimer to your expectations, basically telling you to expect a slight chill. A slight chill is at best what you receive, but that’s not the way the product is marketed, and not what I was expecting.
So the next time I want my whiskey on the rocks, I’ll stick to the fake ones, not the real ones.
8 Comments to Whiskey Stones: Worth the Hype?
Leave a comment
Google Search Tool
Google Translation Tool
The Whiskey Reviewer’s Rating System
The Whiskey Reviewer uses a letter-based rating system, instead of the numerical 100-grade rating system. Click here to learn why.
The following indicators should be taken as only a guide and not a set of hard and fast rules. Some "premium" whiskeys really are quite terrible, while some mass market products are good enough to pour into a decanter and serve to the Duke of Edinburgh.
A+: A masterpiece and one of the ten best whiskeys of its type.
A: An outstanding bottle of whiskey, but lacking that special something which makes for a true masterpiece.
A-: A fine bottle of whiskey, representing the top end of the conventional, premium range.
B+: Very good stuff.
B and B-: Good and above average. The best of the mass market whiskeys fit in this category, as do the bulk of the premium brands.
C+ to C-: Average whiskey.
D+ to D-: Below average whiskey.
From the Editor:
Whiskey Reviewer Categories
- Books and Film (2)
- Feature Articles (67)
- Interview (28)
- News (90)
- Op-Ed (18)
- Tourism (11)
- Uncategorized (5)
- Whiskey Accessories and Products (10)
- Whiskey Barrel Ales and Beers (5)
- Whiskey by Price (244)
- Whiskey by Rating (250)
- Whiskey by Type (403)
- Australian and New Zealand Whisky (2)
- Bourbon Whiskey (140)
- Canadian Whisky (10)
- Corn Whiskey, White Whiskey, and Moonshine (20)
- English Whisky (1)
- French Whisky (5)
- Irish Whiskey (28)
- Japanese Whisky (5)
- Liqueurs (2)
- Other Whiskeys (44)
- Rye Whiskey (47)
- Scotch Whisky (140)
- Spanish Whisky (6)
- Tennessee Whiskey (10)
- Welsh Whiskey (5)
- Whiskey Cocktails (16)
- Whiskey Recipes (19)
- Whiskey Reviews (243)
- Kathy on Troy and Sons Platinum Whiskey Review
- Jim Walters on Whiskey Sourcing and Scandalmongering: All Smoke, No Fire
- JNO Paulson on Whiskey Sourcing and Scandalmongering: All Smoke, No Fire
- Scott on Whiskey Sourcing and Scandalmongering: All Smoke, No Fire
- Miss Whisky Interview with Whiskey Reviewer - Miss Whisky on Miss Whisky Talks Scotch